Quodlibets

A series of twenty-one essays that continues the Sofdaware reflection on page 250 of Method in Theology. The Quodlibets series intends a collaborative effort in relation to Lonergan’s suggestion about dividing up any serious cultural work. Towards the end of the series McShane reaches out towards other collaborators, whose names are mentioned in the flow of essays.

(Please note that in some of the essays there are hyperlinks to works hosted on an earlier version of this website. All of those essays are now available on this website and can be easily found using the search bar.)

Quodlibet 1: A Fresh Beginning

Quodlibet 2: Convenient Images of Creative Control of Meaning

Quodlibet 3: Being Breathless and Late in Talking about Virtue

Quodlibet 4: Shifting Insight 17.3 into a Functional Specialist Context

Quodlibet 5: A Simple reading of Method In Theology, Page 250.

Quodlibet 6: Comparison and Integral Canons of Inquiry

Quodlibet 7: Method in Theology page 250, for Beginners

Quodlibet 8: The Dialectic of My Town, Ma Vlast

Quodlibet 9: Some Foundational Pointings Regarding Evaluation

Quodlibet 10: A Simple Dialectic Positioning on Functional Specialization

Quodlibet 11: Method in Theology, Page 250: The Six Italicized Words

Quodlibet 12: Cantower Demission, Quodlibet Commission

Quodlibet 13: Reading the Book of Herself, Don’t You Know

Quodlibet 14: Reply to ‘Reading the Book of Herself

Quodlibet 15: The Discouraging Cultural Ethos

Quodlibet 16: Seeing Water in a Slice of Brain

Quodlibet 17: The Origins and Goals of Functional Specialization

Quodlibet 18: As IV Leaguers

Quodlibet 19: The Solution to the Problem of Feelings in Lonergan Studies

Quodlibet 20: Lonergan’s Metaphysics: A Functional Interpretation

Quodlibet 21: Recycling Ancient Meanings